ReliefAI News/Blog

Will Technology Hurt the Therapeutic Relationship?  Here's What the Evidence Actually Says.

Written by ReliefAI | Jun 18, 2026 6:39:46 PM

Will Technology Hurt the Therapeutic Relationship?

 

When the subject of RTM comes up, the concern I hear most often from clinicians is: "I became a therapist to connect with people, not to stare at dashboards."

I respect this sentiment deeply. The therapeutic alliance, the collaborative, trusting relationship between patient and provider, is the most consistently powerful predictor of positive treatment outcomes across virtually all therapeutic modalities. Research has long established that alliance quality accounts for a meaningful proportion of treatment outcomes, regardless of the specific therapy approach being used.

So it's not trivial to question: Does introducing digital monitoring tools between sessions help or harm that relationship?

Fortunately, the evidence is reassuring, and in some cases, surprising.

A 2024 meta-analysis by Seuling and colleagues, covering studies comparing videoconferencing and in-person psychotherapy, found no significant difference in therapeutic alliance ratings between the two delivery formats, rated by either patients or therapists. Similarly, a large-scale noninferiority study by Davis and colleagues (2023), comparing 479 matched clients receiving teletherapy with 479 receiving in-person treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic, found that clients in both modalities showed comparable alliance quality and clinical outcomes.

But here's where it gets especially interesting in the case of RTM. The evidence on measurement-based care, the clinical practice underlying RTM, suggests that systematic outcome monitoring can actually strengthen the alliance rather than weaken it. But why?

Why?

First, it demonstrates attentiveness.

When a therapist reviews a patient's between-session data and references it in the next session, saying something like, "I noticed your anxiety scores climbed last Wednesday; what was happening that day?", the patient feels genuinely seen. Not surveilled but seen. There's a meaningful difference, and patients recognize it.

Second, it creates a shared framework.

One of the challenges in psychotherapy is the subjectivity of progress. Patients often wonder whether therapy is "working." Clinicians sometimes struggle to articulate improvement beyond intuition. Routine data creates a shared, objective reference point that both parties can discuss collaboratively. This reduces ambiguity and strengthens the working alliance.

Third, it enables proactive outreach.

RTM gives clinicians the ability to reach out between sessions when data signals a potential concern. That kind of responsiveness, a brief check-in call or message prompted by a mood score drop, communicates care in a way that waiting until the next scheduled appointment simply cannot.

Fourth, it reduces ruptures.

Alliance ruptures, moments when the therapeutic relationship is strained, are normal and, when repaired, can be therapeutically productive. But undetected ruptures are a major driver of dropout. RTM data can flag engagement declines that might signal a rupture, giving clinicians the chance to address it before the patient disengages entirely.

Now, there are legitimate concerns that deserve attention.

Data fatigue is real. If a patient feels burdened by constant tracking, or if the data collection feels disconnected from their actual therapy, it can create friction. This means that the design of the monitoring tool matters enormously. The best platforms are low-burden, clinically relevant, and feel like an extension of therapy, not a homework assignment from a different class.

Privacy anxiety is real. Patients need to trust that their between-session data is being used to support their care, not to judge them. Clear communication during onboarding, explaining why data is collected, who sees it, and how it's used, is essential.

And clinician discomfort is real. Therapists trained in relational, humanistic, or psychodynamic traditions may feel that structured data collection conflicts with their clinical identity. But MBC research suggests that clinicians across theoretical orientations can implement routine monitoring effectively when they understand it as a supplement to, not a substitute for, clinical intuition.

The key insight is this: RTM and digital tools don't replace the therapeutic relationship. They create more moments for it to operate.

Therapy has always been, at its core, about one human being paying careful attention to another. RTM just extends the radius of that attention beyond the four walls of the office and into the patient's daily life.

The therapists who will thrive in the coming decade are not the ones who resist all technology. They're the ones who learn to use technology in service of the relationship, amplifying their clinical impact without losing the human connection that makes therapy work.

Next, we'll dive into the practical playbook. I'll walk through the step-by-step workflow for implementing RTM in a behavioral health practice, from patient selection to billing to documentation.

I'm curious: has your experience with digital tools in therapy been positive, negative, or mixed? What worked and what didn't? Share below.

#TherapeuticAlliance #RTM #MentalHealth #DigitalHealth #TherapistLife #PatientEngagement #BehavioralHealth #TherapyRelationship

REFERENCES & SOURCES

  • Davis, K.A., Zhao, F., Janis, R.A., Castonguay, L.G., Hayes, J.A., & Scofield, B.E. (2023). Therapeutic Alliance and Clinical Outcomes in Teletherapy and In-Person Psychotherapy: A Noninferiority Study During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Psychotherapy Research, 34(5), 589–600. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10503307.2023.2229505

  • Seuling, P.D., Fendel, J.C., Spille, L., Göritz, A.S., & Schmidt, S. (2024). Therapeutic Alliance in Videoconferencing Psychotherapy Compared to Psychotherapy in Person: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 30(10), 1521–1531. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1357633X231161774

  • Progovac, A.M., et al. (2025). Mental Health Care Provider Experiences of Remote Measurement-Based Care Rollout in an Urban Safety-Net Psychiatry Department. JMIR Formative Research, 9, e71570. https://formative.jmir.org/2025/1/e71570